Sunday, April 22, 2007

ROBERT CAPA (1913-1954) (Encyclopedia)


ROBERT CAPA (1913-1954)
On May 25, 1954, the career of Robert Capa, whose exploits as a war photographer had made him a legend in modern photography, came to an abrupt end when he stepped on a land mine on an obscure battlefield in Indochina.
Robert Capa was somewhat careless as a photographer but was carefully dedicated as a man. He participated with courage in almost every great tragedy of his time, and never lost heart nor faith. He was incredibly quick to guess the truth. Knowing the truth, he took risks, risks which were never calculated to hurt anyone but himself. Like most he had faults, but his faults were invariably charming and his virtues never boring. He dressed well, ate well, and picked up the check. He drank frequently, but never to get drunk. And then he went home, to a hotel room. He was at home in any major city of the world, and slightly uncomfortable in the country.


He knew war well, so well he despised it. He sought for peace without expecting it. He was a menace in only one respect. He was perhaps the world’s worst driver. He took no greater risk in war than in crossing the Champs Elysees He teased the old and made them laugh. He taught the young without their knowing it. Children loved him, as did many women. But he never discussed his deepest affections. He suffered behind the scenes from loneliness, insecurity, heartbreak. He died with a camera in his left hand, his story unexpectedly finished. He left behind a thermos of cognac, a few good suits, a bereaved world, and his pictures, among them some of the greatest recorded moments of modern history. He also leaves a legend, for which there is no other description than...Capa.
Robert Capa was born Andrei Friedmann in Budapest in 1913. Deciding that there was little future under the regime in Hungary, he left home at 18 and found a job as a darkroom apprentice with a Berlin picture agency. He shot pictures on the side, and scored his first scoop with some exclusive pictures of Leon Trotsky.

When Hitler took over, Andrei Friedmann took off for Paris. There with his Polish fiancĂ©e, Gerda Taro, he struggled to get established in the rugged business of free lance journalism. The story of this struggle is recounted in John Hersey’s classic magazine article, "The Man Who Invented Himself."

Andrei and Gerda decided to form an association of three people. Gerda was to serve as secretary and sales representative; Andrei was to be a darkroom hired hand; and these two were to be employed by a rich, famous, and talented (and imaginary) American photographer named Robert Capa, then allegedly visiting France. The ‘three’ went to work. Friedmann took the pictures, Gerda sold them, and credit was given the non-existent Capa. Since this Capa was supposed to be so rich, Gerda refused to let his pictures go to any French newspaper for less than 150 francs apiece, three times the prevailing rate.

The secret was soon found out by editor Lucien Vogel of Vue. But it did not matter. He sent Capa and Gerda to Spain, where Capa became famous overnight for his remarkable picture of a dying Spanish soldier. Gerda stayed on, meeting her death on the battlefield. Grief-stricken, Capa went off to China where he took a series of memorable pictures at the battle of Taierchwang, the only significant Chinese victory of the entire war.

Returning to Europe, he covered the Spanish war until its end in early 1939. When World War II broke out, he found himself in America, technically an enemy alien. But he got an assignment from Collier’s, and in 1942 joined the invasion convoy to North Africa, where he switched to the Life staff.

Leaving Africa, Capa jumped into Sicily with the paratroops and went on to the attack on "the soft under belly of the Axis" in the cold grim winter campaign of 1943-44. Soon after Anzio he left Italy for London, and a wild intermission of poker playing and partying with such old friends as Ernest Hemingway, Irwin Shaw, William Saroyan, and John Steinbeck.


On June 6, 1944, an assault barge landed Robert Capa on Omaha Beach. Stumbling ashore under heavy fire, he exposed four rolls of the most famous films in history. As luck would have it, all but eleven frames were ruined in Life’s London darkroom when the emulsion ran in an over-heated drying cabinet. However, Life, and the world press, published the surviving images, calling them "slightly out of focus" from the blurred emulsion. And Capa maintained his dangerous franchise as the most colorful war photographer.
He was to see the war through to its bitter end, actually photographing the death of one of the last Americans killed. But he missed the Armistice, when, in a rare case of misjudgment, he pooh-poohed the tip that would have given him an exclusive.

Capa wanted no more war, but he could not resist covering the birth of Israel in 1949 with Irwin Shaw. By this time he had also participated, with his old friends Henri Cartier-Bresson, David ("Chim") Seymour, George Rodger, and William Vandivert in the birth of Magnum Photos, the first and still the only international cooperative agency of free lance photographers.

This marked a new development in Capa’s career. He became an international businessman, selling and stimulating the work of Magnum photographers as the group grew to include Werner Bischof, Ernst Haas, and many others. With John Steinbeck he went to Russia in 1947, returning with a memorable story for the Ladies’ Home Journal. Also for the Journal, the Magnum group did a series on international family life called "People Are People the World Over," a photographic forerunner of the "Family of Man."

Capa began to think of his future in terms of writing combined with photography and wrote several charming pieces for Holiday. He already had four books to his credit: "Death in the Making" on the Spanish Civil War, "Waterloo Bridge" on the London Blitz, "A Russian Journal," with Steinbeck narrative, and "Slightly Out of Focus" on World War II (sold to Hollywood but never filmed). His literary style was his own: "To me war is like an aging actress—more and more dangerous and less and less photogenic."

In 1954 Capa went to Japan with a Magnum exhibition. While he was there, Life suddenly needed a photographer on the Indochina front. Capa volunteered. But it was one war too many. His luck ran out on May 25. They found him still clutching his camera.

His funeral was held in the old Quaker meeting house at Purchase, New York. In his memory the Overseas Press Club established the Robert Capa Award "for superlative photography requiring exceptional courage and enterprise abroad."

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

A Friend And Colleague Remembers Ajmal Naqshbandi




A Friend And Colleague Remembers Ajmal Naqshbandi
April 16, 2007
By Teru Kuwayama (PDN)

Editor's note: The kidnapping and murder of Afghan journalist Ajmal Naqshbandi, who had worked as a translator and fixer for many photojournalists in Afghanistan, mobilized journalists around the world. Naqshbandi had been abducted March 6 along with Italian reporter Daniele Mastrogiacomo; their driver, Sayed Agha, was murdered a few days after their abduction. Mastrogiacomo was released March 19 in what appeared to have been an exchange for five Taliban prisoners being held by the Afghan government, but Naqshbandi continued to be held. The Committee to Protect Journalists circulated a petition, signed by over 300 journalists, demanding action on Naqshbandi's behalf. But on April 9, a spokesperson for Taliban commander Mullah Dadullah announced that Naqshbandi had been beheaded because the government of Afghan president Hamid Karzai had not met their demands.

New York-based photojournalist Teru Kuwayama, who had worked closely with Naqshbandi, shares this remembrance of his friend and colleague, and pays tribute to the often unnamed fixers like Naqshbandi and Agha who risk their lives to help journalists tell their stories.

Ajmal Naqshbandi was one of my first friends in Afghanistan. We met in Kabul in 2002, in the months following the fall of the Taliban regime. Kabul was a city in ruins, emerging from eight years of totalitarian madness, and decades of warfare.

I met Ajmal at a nameless guest house, where he was working as the manager. He must have been twenty years old at the time. As foreign armies, aid groups, and journalists flooded into the country, young Afghans like Ajmal who spoke some English were in demand as translators and fixers. The luckiest might make hundreds of US dollars a day working for the television networks. Ajmal was making a couple of dollars a day running the guest house for its most recent owner, a Northern Alliance commander who had seized the property and was renting it to a handful of French aid workers. It was my first time in Afghanistan, and Ajmal and I were both new at what we were doing. We became friends, translating our worlds to one another. He would ask me about life in America, and the strange world he was watching on the new satellite TV, and would tell me about life growing up under the Taliban, and about a girl in Ghazni he was in love with. When I left Kabul, I gave him what was left of my money, about $30, so he could take a computer class¬—he had already started working on the side as an assistant to a Japanese newspaper reporter who had moved into the house, and he was hoping that if he learned word processing, he could get a better job at an NGO.

Two years later, when I returned to Kabul, Ajmal was waiting for me outside the airport in a four-wheel-drive SUV. He hugged me, handed me one of his extra mobile phones, and drove me to a new guest house he had opened a few streets away from our old place. He had a position as a correspondent for the Japanese newspaper, and aside from filing news reports for them, he was sought after as a fixer and translator by journalists from all over the world.

In a chaotic, dangerous environment, Ajmal inspired trust. He was brave without being aggressive, unfailingly considerate and polite, and he was well liked by the reporters he worked with. Like us, he lived and worked in a balancing act of ambition and caution, and made it somehow seem almost safe. It wasn't just something he did for the money - without any formal training at all, he practiced journalism with a level of commitment and integrity that most of his clients could aspire to. We didn't hesitate to put our lives in his hands.

The last time I saw Ajmal was in December, a few months before he was killed. He had become the go-to guy for arranging meetings with the Taliban forces in eastern Afghanistan, and he told me that he had been warned by the Afghan government not to help foreign reporters to interview "the enemy." The country had taken a definitive slide for the worse, and the sense of optimism that I remembered from my first visit to Afghanistan was gone. New buildings of glass and steel and luxury hotels had risen all over Kabul, but no one had any illusions about who ruled the land outside the city limits.

Even Ajmal was bleak in his outlook for Afghanistan's future. Like many Afghans, he was frustrated by the pervasive corruption in the new government, worried about the increasing insecurity throughout the country, and angry at the apparent disregard for civilian casualties inflicted by foreign armies. He asked me, not for the first time, about getting out, and if I thought an Afghan could get a visa to come to America. I had no good answers for him, but I begged him to be careful in Afghanistan, because he was operating in a truly dangerous space. Unlike the foreign reporters he worked with, Ajmal, and his fellow fixers, translators, and local journalists, had no safety net. As the go-between between two sides, he was exposed on both ends, and in many ways, we feared less that the Taliban would harm him, than that he might end up arrested by his own government, or detained by coalition forces and disappeared forever to some non-existent interrogation center.

In the end, Ajmal died as a poker chip on the bargaining table between Dadullah's Taliban faction and Karzai's national government. Both sides claim to represent the people of Afghanistan, but neither seemed to care much about the life of one of Afghanistan's best citizens, and brightest hopes. For those of us who knew Ajmal, it's hard to imagine a future without him. It was people like Ajmal who made the story of Afghanistan inspirational, not just tragic.

It's hard for me to fathom what goes through the minds of people like Karzai and Dadullah. Perhaps they thought Ajmal's life was insignificant, and would be forgotten. It might have been a good bet, because sadly, that's how things often go. Ajmal wasn't the first to die in this line of work, and I don't expect him to be the last. Seven journalists are confirmed as killed in the line of duty this year alone, another seven cases remain unconfirmed. All of them were local journalists, with names like Ajmal, Abdulrazak, Jamal, and an unknown number of "media workers" or "journalist assistants" like Sayed Agha, a 25-year-old father of four who died with Ajmal, two weeks into his career as a driver for foreign journalists. These are the people who do the heavy lifting, who face the greatest dangers, and who most often pay the greatest price for our work.

As it happened, Ajmal wasn't forgotten. People from all over the world, who, in most cases had never met him, stepped up, and refused to let it go. From Kabul to Rome to New York, thousands of people mobilized and worked for his release. Ultimately, we couldn't bring him home, and for those of us who knew him, it's a sickening, heartbreaking reality that's just starting to sink in.

I can remember my last moments with him, sitting in the apartment in Kabul he'd bought for himself and his new wife, the girl from Ghazni. We talked about how much our lives had changed in the past five years, and how unimaginable our current lives would have been to us back then. We talked about our plans for the future, and for the coming year in Afghanistan. At the time, I couldn't have imagined an Afghanistan without him. I still can't.

Donations to the families of Naqshbandi and Agha can be made at (youarenotforgotten.net).The donations are managed by November 11, a 503c tax-exempt organization.

Blade Will Review Detrich's Award-Winners

Blade Will Review Detrich's Award-Winners

April 16, 2007
By Daryl Lang (PDN)

Following the revelation that photographer Allan Detrich submitted dozens of manipulated photos for publication in 2007, the Toledo Blade is reviewing Detrich's award-winning work from last year.

If the paper finds any evidence of digital alteration in the winning work, it will return the awards, assistant managing editor for administration Luann Sharp said Monday.

In 2006 Detrich's photographs won three first-place awards from the Cleveland Press Club and two honorable mentions from the Ohio News Photographers Association.

Sharp said the review was not expected to take as long as the investigation into of all of Detrich's 2007 work, which took just over a week.

On Sunday, the Blade reported that 79 of the 947 images Detrich had submitted to the paper this year had been digitally altered. The Blade published 27 of the manipulated images in the newspaper and online, and an additional 31 online only.

Detrich resigned from the paper April 7 after one of his front-page photos showing the Bluffton University baseball team was found to be manipulated. Detrich initially claimed he had submitted the wrong photo to the newspaper by mistake. On Sunday he said he had no comment on the Blade's review of his work.

Sharp says the Blade has "no indication that anyone else is involved," in manipulating photos at the paper. Blade director of photography Nate Parsons directed all questions to Sharp on Monday.

The Blade published two examples of Detrich's manipulated photos on Sunday, in addition to the Bluffton photo. Sharp said the Blade editors are discussing whether to publish more examples of his work online. Editors have blocked access to Detrich's photos in the newspaper's archive to make sure none run in the future.

"We basically consider it done," Sharp said, referring to the investigation of Detrich's work. "We know all we need to know."

personalities


former boxer george foreman. (C) Etc Magazine

Travel


rays at burj al arab. (C) Etc Magazine

Travel


couple in a dhow at creek. (C) Etc Magazine

Monday, April 16, 2007

Indian Press Photo awards announced

© Indian Express, The | Link to original story
Permanent link: http://www.newswatch.in/?p=6330
Sections: People, Photojournalism

MUMBAI : Sometimes a photograph says what an entire news report cannot. Whether it’s a riot-stricken city or people displaced by natural calamities, it is often the photojournalist who braves his surroundings for that perfect frame.

The India Press Photo Awards instituted by The Ramnath Goenka Foundation are an initiative to identify, promote and reward excellence in photojournalism and documentary photography. This year, the ceremony will be held on December 15 at Express Towers, Nariman Point.

This year, the top honour, The Ramnath Goenka Picture of the Year Award, has been bagged by Vipin Pawar of DNA for his evocative picture of the Gateway of India stabbing incident. He will receive a cash prize of Rs 1 lakh.

The winner in Spot News category is Amit Dave from Reuters, while Aziz Bhutta of Rajasthan Patrika stood first in the General News category.

Manish Swaroop of Associated Press wins in the Daily Life category, even as Altaf Qadri of the European Press Agency wins in the Sports Action and Feature category. All 12 winners will receive a cash prize of Rs 50,000 and a trophy each.

This apart, there are 11 who have been named for an Honourable Mention. All winning photos will be displayed at the Express Gallery.

The first IPP awards function was held in December 2004 and since then it has become an annual platform for photographers to display their best work in constantly evolving categories of photo journalism.

While photojournalists in India once saw their job as a source of livelihood, today they understand their social, political and moral responsibilities as professional lensmen.

However, the Indian photojournalism scenario has been plagued by lack of opportunity to showcase and recognize talent, lack of motivation and international exposure.

Hence the IPP Awards. This year, there were over 4,700 entries. These were in several categories—spot news, general news, daily life, people in the news, arts and entertainment, sports, nature and environment, contemporary issues, advertising photography and international photographer covering India.

This year’s panel of judges included Devika Daulat Singh, director of photography at PhotoInk, New Delhi, Pablo Bartholomew, a photojournalist and documentary photographer with Gamma-Liaison Photo News Agency, New York and Prashant Panjiar, who works with Time magazine and runs his own photo agency.

“The number of entries has gone up dramatically this year, as is bound to happen with the contest getting more popular. But I think the bar hasn’t significantly risen,” said Panjiar.

The judges went through every image—subjects ranged from the strife in Kashmir to people hit by the tsunami to newsmakers like Amitabh Bachchan and Bal Thackeray—narrowing down selections through various rounds. The photographers remained anonymous all through the selection process.

Swapan Parekh who was on the IPP jury last year and on the World Press Photo jury in 2004 and 2005 says, “What makes sense is to see how things are moving forward. The long-term goal of these awards is that it reaches a level when we’re not just seeing things in our own backyard. It’s a slow process, but can happen if standards stay high. Like journalism, the awards are just a validation of good work after you’ve done it.”

With the credibility of the media challenged time and again, we are still able to identify brave men and women who continue to report events as they are. The IPP Awards are dedicated to them.

(India Press Photo Awards is brought to you by The Indian Express with the support of Canon as associate sponsor and exchange4media as the online media partner)

2006 WINNERS

Vipin Pawar (DNA): RNG Picture of The Year Award
Amit Dave (Reuters): Spot News
Aziz Bhutta (Rajasthan Patrika): General News
Rafiq Maqbool (AP): General News Story
Altaf Qadri (EPA): Sports Action and Feature
Prashant Nadkar (The Indian Express): People in News
Yasin Dar (Freelance): People in News Story
Ashima Narain (Freelance): Nature & Environment
Manish Swaroop (AP): Daily Life
Sohrab Hura (Freelance): Daily Life Story
Mahendra Parikh (The Indian Express): Art & Entertainment
Arvind Jain (The Week): Contemporary Issues
Samkit Shah (Freelance): Contemporary Issues Story

A basic rule: Newspaper photos must tell the truth..

A basic rule: Newspaper photos must tell the truth

Ron Royhab, Vice President, Executive Editor, toledoblade.com (PDN)

Allan Detrich, an award winning Blade photographer, resigned from the staff April 7 after admitting he digitally altered the content of a photograph that was published on The Blade's front page.

The incident was reported in this newspaper and in the national media and in online journalism publications. We conducted an internal investigation and found that since January dozens of digitally altered photographs of his were published either in the newspaper or on our Web site.
Readers have asked us why this was such a big deal. What's wrong with changing the content of a photograph that is published in a newspaper?
The answer is simple: It is dishonest.
Journalism, whether by using words or pictures, must be an accurate representation of the truth.

Details of the incident unfolded gradually in the days after Mr. Detrich's digitally altered picture was published on March 31. The dramatic photograph showed members of the Bluffton University baseball team kneeling in prayer before playing their first game since five of their players died in a March 2 bus crash in Atlanta.
We did not know at the time of publication that the photographer, using a computerized photo-editing tool called Photoshop, had removed the legs of a person wearing blue jeans and standing in the background behind a banner.
The matter was brought to my attention on April 4 by Donald R. Winslow, editor of News Photographer, a publication of the National Press Photographers Association. Mr. Winslow said that on April 2, photographers from the Dayton Daily News were comparing how various Ohio newspapers covered the Bluffton baseball game. Each paper had its own similar Bluffton picture. But The Blade's picture was the only one with the mysterious blue-jean clad legs missing.
After establishing that the photograph was altered, The Blade immediately started its investigation. We published a correction and an apology to our readers on April 6.
When questioned by Blade editors, Mr. Detrich admitted manipulating the photograph, offering the explanation that it was for his personal use and that he mistakenly transmitted it to the newspaper for publication. He was suspended while the investigation continued. The next day he resigned.
An intensive investigation of Mr. Detrich's work, conducted by Nate Parsons, The Blade's director of photography, found that since January of this year, Mr. Detrich submitted 947 photographs for publication, of which 79 had been digitally altered.
Twenty-seven of the altered photographs were published both in the newspaper and on toledoblade.com, and an additional 31 were published only on toledoblade.com. Another 21 altered photographs submitted by Mr. Detrich were not published.
The changes Mr. Detrich made included erasing people, tree limbs, utility poles, electrical wires, electrical outlets, and other background elements from photographs. In other cases, he added elements such as tree branches and shrubbery.
Mr. Detrich also submitted two sports photographs in which items were inserted. In one he added a hockey puck and in the other he added a basketball, each hanging in mid-air. Neither was published.
The Blade is removing all of Mr. Detrich's photographs from toledoblade.com and blocked access to any of his photographs in the newspaper's archive. Like many other newspapers, The Blade shares its work with the Associated Press, an international news cooperative. On April 6, the AP removed all 50 of Mr. Detrich's photographs from its archives.
Honesty is the fundamental value in journalism.
When a Blade reporter or photographer covers a news event, the newspaper and its readers expect an accurate record of the event.
Reporters and editors are not allowed to change quotes or alter events to make them more dramatic. Photographers and photo editors cannot digitally alter the content in the frame of a photograph to make the image more powerful or artistic.
This principle is widely recognized. In 1991, at the dawn of the digital age, the National Press Photographers Association adopted a "Digital Manipulation Code of Ethics," which all members are required to sign.
That lengthy code makes it very clear that altering the editorial content of a picture is a breach of ethical standards. All Blade photographers are members of the association. All of them have signed the code of ethics, and The Blade follows this code.
This newspaper has a terrific staff of professional journalists. They work hard to bring you the truth in stories and photographs of what is happening in our community, every day of the year. It is especially dismaying to have something like this happen that may cast doubt on our work.
It's impossible to make sense of why this happened, and we are embarrassed by it. But it is important that we are up front and honest with our readers.
Mr. Detrich joined The Blade in 1989 and has won hundreds of newspaper photography awards over the years. He was a Pulitzer finalist in 1998. The work he turned in always appeared to be quality photojournalism, which is why editors had no reason to suspect he was digitally altering photographs.
In this respect, we let our readers down, and we apologize for that and pledge to you that we will do better.
Contact Ron Royhab at: royhab@theblade.com

Blade Editor: Detrich Submitted 79 Altered Photos This Year



Blade Editor: Detrich Submitted 79 Altered Photos This Year

April 15, 2007
By Daryl Lang (PDN)

The Toledo Blade now says it unknowingly published dozens of digitally manipulated images submitted by staff photographer Allan Detrich.

An internal investigation found that Detrich, who resigned April 7, submitted 79 images this year that had been altered, Blade vice president and executive editor Ron Royhab writes in the paper's Sunday edition.

The details in Royhab's column cast Detrich as a serial Photoshopper, crossing well-established ethical lines on a routine basis.

"The changes Mr. Detrich made included erasing people, tree limbs, utility poles, electrical wires, electrical outlets, and other background elements from photographs. In other cases, he added elements such as tree branches and shrubbery," Royhab writes. In two cases, Detrich added a basketball and a hockey puck to sports photos.

The development represents an extraordinary fall for Detrich, a 17-year veteran of the Blade who has won numerous awards and claimed in an April 5 interview, "I'm not a cloner, that's not something I would do."

Several photojournalists have lost their jobs in recent years over digital manipulation, but none has been accused of as many infractions as Detrich.

Blade director of photography Nate Parsons led a review of 947 photos Detrich had submitted for publication since January. Of those photos, 79 were altered. The Blade published 27 of those images in the newspaper and online, and an additional 31 online only. Twenty-one of the digitally altered photos were not published.

The Blade did not print a detailed breakdown of which photos were altered. In Sunday's paper, it published just two examples: an image of a hair salon in which a cord in the background had been erased, and a women's college basketball photo in which a basketball had been added to the shot. The salon photo originally ran online; the basketball photo was never published, the paper says.

Detrich's work came under scrutiny early this month, when photographers at other Ohio newspapers noticed a suspicious inconsistency in one of his front-page photos. In a photo of the Bluffton University baseball team, Detrich erased a pair of legs that were protruding from behind a banner in the background. Other photographers shot nearly identical images that showed the legs. The Blade says it first became aware of the suspicious image when a reporter from the National Press Photographers Association publication News Photographer contacted them.

Detrich admitted altering the Bluffton photograph but said he did so for personal use and submitted the altered image to his editors by mistake. The paper suspended Detrich and began investigating his work, and Detrich resigned soon after.

The Blade and The Associated Press have already blocked access to Detrich's work in their archives, and the Blade says it also will remove all of Detrich's work from toledoblade.com.

The Blade only examined Detrich's work since January. The review apparently did not survey his earlier work, including photos last year that won Detrich three first-place awards from the Cleveland Press Club and two honorable mentions from the Ohio News Photographers Association.

Detrich has been working for the Blade since 1989 and was a finalist for a 1998 Pulitzer Prize in feature photography. In 1994 the Ohio News Photographers Association named him Photographer of the Year.

Detrich declined to comment Sunday. In a brief phone interview April 9, Detrich said little about the upcoming Blade investigation. "I don't know what they're going to find. I've put that behind me," he said. Detrich is planning to start a weather disaster training service with two friends, a company called www.DisasterWeatherTraining.com, according to his blog.

Royhab's Sunday column, which ran on page B1, apologizes to readers and says all Blade photojournalists must adhere to the National Press Photographers Association's Digital Manipulation Code of Ethics.

"It's impossible to make sense of why this happened, and we are embarrassed by it. But it is important that we are up front and honest with our readers," Royhab writes. "Mr. Detrich joined The Blade in 1989 and has won hundreds of newspaper photography awards over the years. He was a Pulitzer finalist in 1998. The work he turned in always appeared to be quality photojournalism, which is why editors had no reason to suspect he was digitally altering photographs. In this respect, we let our readers down, and we apologize for that and pledge to you that we will do better."

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Photokina-Cologne

Photokina-Cologne

Photokina-Cologne

Germany-Cologne

Germany-Cologne

Street


streetplay in Rajasthan, India.

Travel


A old woman during a rally in Kerala, India

Dubai.2005

A Brief History of Photojournalism

A Brief History of Photojournalism
Dillon Westbrook

The photograph has affected the way many cultures throughout the world understand and learn about their world. One of the main fields responsible for this paradigm is photojournalism. Photojournalism is the use of photographs in conjunction with the reporting of news in media such as print newspapers, magazines, television news and internet reporting. The incorporation of photographs into news reports is so ubiquitous that a story without photographs to a contemporary audience feels incomplete, as though they were only getting half the story. Consumers depend upon photojournalists to bring them the images that allow them to feel connected to far-away realities, and to be educated about those realities.

Photojournalism distinguishes itself from other forms of professional photography by its adherence to the principles of journalism: timeliness, accuracy, fair representation of the context of events and facts reported, and accountability to the public. While a wedding photographer may be documenting an actual event, his or her responsibility is to the client and the presentation that client would like to see. A journalist, on the other hand, cannot be held to the demands of the photographic subject, but rather he or she must be concerned with producing accurate news for the public.

In addition to accuracy, the photojournalist must be careful not to exclude important parts of the context of the event being photographed. A shot of an individual rioter breaking a store window can look like an isolated act of criminality if the photojournalist does not show it in the context of a larger social event whose significance goes beyond the individual act.

The emergence of photojournalism, along with its current trajectory, depends a great deal upon technological developments in the camera. As early as the Crimean War in the mid-19 th century, photographers were using the novel technology of the box camera to record images of British soldiers in the field. However, the widespread use of cameras as a way of reporting news didn’t come until the advent of smaller, more portable cameras which used the enlargeable film negative to record images. The introduction of the 35 mm Leica camera in the 1930’s made it possible for photographers to move with the action, taking shots of events as they are unfolding.

Newspapers quickly took advantage of this portability, and publications like Life, Sports Illustrated, and The Daily Mirror staked their reputation on fresh, timely images of matters of interest to their readers. In the first golden age of photojournalism, which lasted from the 1930’s to the 50’s, photographers such as Robert Capa and Alfred Eistenstaedt became household names for the news-consuming public. Capa would later go on to found, along with three other photojournalists, the Magnum agency, which supported photojournalists and negotiated to get them copyright of their images, as opposed to letting copyright revert to the publication.

In the late 1970’s, the cultural importance of photojournalism began to be recognized by the art world, and photojournalists were given exhibitions and retrospectives at museums and galleries. Photojournalists like Don McCullin received wide attention in retrospectives across the country. Today, most major museums will devote a showing or more a year to photojournalists and documentary photographers.

With the introduction of digital cameras, photojournalism has greatly augmented its capacity for reporting up-to-the-minute news from around the world. Not limited by exposures on a roll of film, digital chips can store up to a thousand images, and are less sensitive to airport x-rays and exposure to light. With a wireless internet connection, a photojournalist can send images from the field to his or her editor within seconds of their initial capture. As a medium, the digital photograph has opened up new venues for gathering news, from small, self-published newsletters, to the online blog. These new venues mean an increased market and an accelerated pace for the transmission of news through photographic images.

Thursday, April 12, 2007

HOMAI VYARAWALLA: Living life on her own terms


India through her eyes
NEETA LAL (The Hindu)

At 92, Homai Vyarawalla, India's first and most famous woman photojournalist, remains as active as ever.

HOMAI VYARAWALLA, 92, seems fuelled by some benign supernatural energy. She rustles up gourmet chicken and mutton dishes "at short notice", cleans and mops her house, dusts its interiors, does the odd plumbing job, drives her own car (a 1950's Fiat model) and even crafts her own furniture!

Perhaps it was this incredible drive that helped Vyarawalla click astoundingly well as India's first and most famous woman photojournalist. As a scribe — whose spectacular body of work spans a century — Vyarawalla has not only chronicled the last days of the British Empire, the euphoria of Independence, the birth pangs and growth of a new nation but a repertoire of interesting VIPs, politicians and celebrities on her legendary Rolleiflex and Mamiyaflex twin lens cameras.

Sheer elegance
In fact the nonagenarian's iconic photographs have now become a part of collective Indian memory for their sheer elegance. The swearing-in of Lord Mountbatten as Governor General of India, the Dalai Lama's first visit to India in 1956, Lal Bahadur Shastri's death, fashion shows at the British High Commission, a flurry of presidential and prime ministerial visits to India, a young Jawahar and Indira Gandhi, Rajiv and Sanjay... are all a part of the erstwhile photographer's substantive portfolio of over 10,000 photos.

Fortunately, these photos are now also a part of a book titled Camera Chronicles of Homai Vyarawalla released recently by Parzor Foundation and Mapin Publishing. And undoubtedly, this project constitutes the exploration of an extraordinary woman's engagement with the historic events occurring around her. To coincide with the book launch, an exclusive retrospective exhibition of over a 100 rare photos — connected with Vyarawalla's life, times and work — have also been mounted at the Lalit Kala Akademi in New Delhi this month.

Though a tad effusive, this belated attention is worth every bit considering Vyarawalla was the only professional woman photojournalist in India during her time. Her survival — nay, success — in an overwhelmingly male domain is all the more remarkable because the profession continues to exclude most women even today. Ironically, even western photojournalists who visited Indian shores regularly — such as Margaret Bourke-White and Henri Cartier Bresson — have received more attention than Vyarawalla. In this already invisible history, Vyarawalla's presence as a woman was even more marginalised. Hopefully, Camera Chronicles — which acknowledges her role as a pioneer among women and her tremendous contribution to early photojournalism in India — will get the perspective in order.

Early life
Born into a middle-class Parsi family in 1913 in Navsari (Gujarat), Vyarawalla's father was an actor in a travelling Urdu-Parsi theatre company. She grew up in a Bombay where she was the only girl in her class to complete her matriculation exam. She learnt photography from her boyfriend Maneckshaw (whom she later married), some of her earliest works being published under his byline. Beginning her career in Bombay during the World War II, Vyarawalla shifted base to Delhi around Independence recording key political and social events till she laid down her camera in 1970.

Interestingly, though Vyarawalla gave up photography over 35 years ago, she still takes meticulous care of her six antique cameras that are preserved in her Baroda house in an excellent condition.

So what, according to the lady, are the attributes of a good photographer? "Maintaining the dignity of the subject is of utmost importance," she says after you repeat the question several times due to her now-impaired hearing. "The composition should never show the clicked person in a derogatory way." And she goes on to narrate the incident of Pakistani President Ayub Khan's arrival in India in 1959, whom Jawaharlal Nehru had gone to receive at the airport.
"But since Khan was very tall, he seemed to tower over Nehru in all my frames which didn't show him in a good light," says the now retired photographer.

To get around this problem, Vyarawalla chose an angle that required her to almost lie flat on the ground for a period of time. This quixotic posture got the perfectionist scribe the desired results, albeit with a mishap — her sari got undone in the photographers' stampede to cover the event!

"But despite that, I didn't compromise upon my angle," guffaws the nonagenarian, "and managed to get pictures which depicted Nehru at par with Ayub!"

Plum assignments
It was this remarkable doggedness — and perfectionism — that became Vyarawalla's imprimatur. As her reputation spread, the photojournalist was flooded with plum professional assignments from prestigious media outfits.

After a stint at The Bombay Chronicle (where she was paid two annas per picture!), she went on to put in a few years at The Illustrated Weekly of India (owned by the British then) followed by a slew of Parsi publications including the Jaan-e-Jamshed. In the 1950s, the British Information Services snapped up Vyarawalla for their cachet of in-house publications. In fact so impressed were the English with her work that they even allowed her to freelance in her spare time despite paying her a substantive salary.

Not that life has been cruel to her. In fact even today — as Vyarawalla turns 93 on December 9 this year — this spunky Sagittarian continues to live life on her own terms in her beautiful ancestral Baroda home, tinkering with her antique cameras, cooking mutton-chicken and continuing to bask in the fond attention that her fans and the media shower upon her petite frame.

Military Still Holding AP Photographer 365 Days Later

Military Still Holding AP Photographer 365 Days Later

April 12, 2007
By Daryl Lang (PDN)

On April 12, 2006 Associated Press photographer Bilal Hussein was arrested in Ramadi, Iraq, by the U.S. military. He has now been their prisoner for one year.

While the AP continues to work for his release, Hussein is caught in a system that labels him a security risk and gives him no access to a fair trial. He is far from alone: There are about 18,000 security detainees being held at two facilities in Iraq, according to the military.

Dozens of Iraqi journalists have been held for short times and released, but Hussein's case is extraordinary because of his high profile work for the AP and the long amount of time he has been detained.

The AP has steadfastly defended Hussein, a Sunni Iraqi whose photography was part of a package that won the 2005 Pulitzer Prize for breaking news photography. The AP says its own review turned up no evidence that Hussein is associated with the insurgency.

"Bilal has done nothing to justify a year in detention without charges," says Paul Gardephe, a lawyer working on Bilal's behalf for the Associated Press, quoted in an AP story this week. "The military has not provided any credible evidence to support the various accusations of criminal conduct that it has made."

Gardephe met with Hussein recently at the Camp Cropper prison, near the Baghdad airport, the AP reports. While Hussein is permitted to meet with a lawyer and AP staff, neither they nor Hussein himself are allowed to attend his review hearings.

A military spokesperson said Wednesday that Hussein's case has been reviewed four times, most recently in November. Each review determined that he was a security risk. His case was reviewed by the Detention Review Authority on April 22, 2006, a "Magistrate Cell" of judge advocates on April 25, 2006, and the Iraqi-U.S. Combined Review and Release Board on July 2, 2006 and November 6, 2006. The Combined Review and Release Board is scheduled to examine his case again in the next 30 days.

"Iraq continues to hold Mr. Hussein as an imperative threat to the security of the Iraqi people and Multi-National Forces in accordance with United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1546, 1637 and 1723," the unnamed military spokesperson said in an e-mail.

According to Gardephe, the AP lawyer, U.S. officials have leveled nine informal allegations against Hussein, but indicate that they lack solid evidence on seven of the allegations. The two other charges include offering to make a fake ID for an insurgent sniper and taking photographs synchronized with explosions.

But Gardephe says the charges lack merit, given that fake IDs are readily available in Iraq and none of the 900 photographs Hussein submitted to the AP were synchronized with an explosion.

AP executives and press organizations have publicly called for Hussein's release or for formal charges to be levied against him.

"The United States must release our colleague Bilal Hussein," said Joel Simon, executive director of the Committee to Protect Journalists, in a statement this week. "The authorities have had a full year to produce evidence and bring charges but have failed to do so."

Hussein was a shopkeeper from Fallujah who joined the AP to help with newsgathering and later was trained as a photographer. He covered fighting in Fallujah and Ramadi, where some of his photographs showed insurgents firing weapons at U.S. forces.

The AP worked for several months behind the scenes to argue for Hussein's release before going public with his story last September.

Hussein's family is allowed to visit him one hour a month, the AP reports.

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

DUBAI WORLD CUP 2007

Dubai World Cup
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Dubai World Cup is a horse race held annually since 1996 at the Nad Al Sheba Racecourse in the city of Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The race is operated through the Emirates Horse Racing Authority (EHRA) whose Chairman is Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Presidential Affairs of Dubai.
The race was the creation of the Ruler of Dubai Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum who owns Darley Stud & Godolphin Racing, one of the world's leading thoroughbred breeding and racing operations.
It is the world's richest horse race, with a purse of USD 6 million since 2004. It is a Group 1 flat race on dirt for four-year-old and above thoroughbreds run over a distance of 2,000 metres (1 mile 2 furlongs) in late March.
The race's first winner was the future United States Hall of Fame thoroughbred, Cigar, owned by Allen E. Paulson.
Due to its importance in racing, in 2006 the Dubai World Cup was broadcast live on TVG Network and HRTV and taped later for showing on ABC. It was the first time that the race was shown on national TV in the United States.

NOTE:- (C) Copyright for these photos belongs solely to S. KIRAN PRASAD Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.

DWC9

DWC8

DWC7

DWC6

DWC5

DWC4

DWC3

DWC2

DWC1

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

NPPA Code of Ethics..

NPPA Code of Ethics (National Press Photographers Association)
For further details about NPPA's rules and guidelines for professional behavior, see the NPPA Bylaws.
Preamble
The National Press Photographers Association, a professional society that promotes the highest standards in photojournalism, acknowledges concern for every person's need both to be fully informed about public events and to be recognized as part of the world in which we live.

Photojournalists operate as trustees of the public. Our primary role is to report visually on the significant events and on the varied viewpoints in our common world. Our primary goal is the faithful and comprehensive depiction of the subject at hand. As photojournalists, we have the responsibility to document society and to preserve its history through images.

Photographic and video images can reveal great truths, expose wrongdoing and neglect, inspire hope and understanding and connect people around the globe through the language of visual understanding. Photographs can also cause great harm if they are callously intrusive or are manipulated.

This code is intended to promote the highest quality in all forms of photojournalism and to strengthen public confidence in the profession. It is also meant to serve as an educational tool both for those who practice and for those who appreciate photojournalism. To that end, The National Press Photographers Association sets forth the following Code of Ethics:

Code of Ethics
Photojournalists and those who manage visual news productions are accountable for upholding the following standards in their daily work:

Be accurate and comprehensive in the representation of subjects.
Resist being manipulated by staged photo opportunities.
Be complete and provide context when photographing or recording subjects. Avoid stereotyping individuals and groups. Recognize and work to avoid presenting one's own biases in the work.
Treat all subjects with respect and dignity. Give special consideration to vulnerable subjects and compassion to victims of crime or tragedy. Intrude on private moments of grief only when the public has an overriding and justifiable need to see.
While photographing subjects do not intentionally contribute to, alter, or seek to alter or influence events.
Editing should maintain the integrity of the photographic images' content and context. Do not manipulate images or add or alter sound in any way that can mislead viewers or misrepresent subjects.
Do not pay sources or subjects or reward them materially for information or participation.
Do not accept gifts, favors, or compensation from those who might seek to influence coverage.
Do not intentionally sabotage the efforts of other journalists.
Ideally, photojournalists should:

Strive to ensure that the public's business is conducted in public. Defend the rights of access for all journalists.
Think proactively, as a student of psychology, sociology, politics and art to develop a unique vision and presentation. Work with a voracious appetite for current events and contemporary visual media.
Strive for total and unrestricted access to subjects, recommend alternatives to shallow or rushed opportunities, seek a diversity of viewpoints, and work to show unpopular or unnoticed points of view.
Avoid political, civic and business involvements or other employment that compromise or give the appearance of compromising one's own journalistic independence.
Strive to be unobtrusive and humble in dealing with subjects.
Respect the integrity of the photographic moment.
Strive by example and influence to maintain the spirit and high standards expressed in this code. When confronted with situations in which the proper action is not clear, seek the counsel of those who exhibit the highest standards of the profession. Photojournalists should continuously study their craft and the ethics that guide it.

Toledo Blade Ran Doctored Photo On Front Page..



The altered photo on the front page of the March 31 Toledo Blade was shot from the same angle as photos that ran in other newspapers.

Toledo Blade Ran Doctored Photo On Front Page
April 05, 2007
By Daryl Lang

The Toledo Blade published a photo on its March 31 front page that was digitally altered to remove a distracting pair of legs.
The photographer admits he altered the photo on his laptop at the scene, but says he meant to keep that file for personal use and transmitted it to his editors by accident.
"It was mistake, plain and simple," says staff photographer Allan Detrich. "But it was a big mistake."
The photo shows members of the Bluffton University baseball team praying before their season opener, their first game after five of their teammates were killed in a bus accident.
The NPPA's News Photographer magazine first reported the case of manipulation on its Web site Thursday. The Blade acknowledged Thursday that the photo had been manipulated and said it was investigating.
"This allegation was brought to our attention by the NPPA late Wednesday night," the Blade said in a statement e-mailed by Assistant Managing Editor Luann Sharp. "The Blade's preliminary investigation confirms that the photo of the Bluffton baseball team published on page A-1 March 31, was digitally altered before it was submitted to the newspaper for publication. It was one of 16 photos turned in and it was the only one that was altered prior to being sent to the photo desk. The photographer's explanation is that he altered the photo for his personal files and inadvertently transmitted the wrong picture for publication. The Blade takes such matters very seriously and we are continuing our internal investigation. We will also notify our readers that an altered photograph was published."
The NPPA and others noticed the alteration because other photographers were shooting the same scene from a similar angle. Nearly identical photographs ran on the front pages of at least three other Ohio newspapers - cropped extremely horizontal to show the kneeling players and five banners memorializing their teammates killed in the accident. In every photograph except Detrich's, a pair of legs is seen protruding from behind a banner hanging on a fence.
In an interview Thursday with PDN, Detrich admitted he made a mistake, but said it was not malicious.
"I did one copy where I cloned out the legs and stuff for my personal use," Detrich says. "Sometimes I like to just make pictures beautiful. And I'll make a print for my office or something. I put that in a personal folder on my computer called 'keepers.' At the same time, I also had the original photo with the legs in my transmit folder. And the altered one was also in my transmit folder but hadn't gotten deleted. We were on deadline, I clicked the picture, transmitted it and obviously it was the wrong one to send. And that's what happened."
"I've been in this business 25 years. I'm not a cloner, that's not something I would do," he says.
Detrich says he has worked for the Blade since 1989 and has never had another incident like this one.
As for why he didn't inform his editors earlier that the wrong photo had run, Detrich says he simply didn't see the newspaper.
"I'm on the road five days a week and I don't get the paper at my house. If I would have seen it I would have noticed it was the wrong picture and notified my editors," he says. "If I get into the Blade [office] I have time to look at papers, but I don't see papers every day."
News Photographer reports that the person standing behind the sign in the photo was another photographer: Madalyn Ruggiero, a freelancer working for the Chicago Tribune. Ruggiero told the Web site she was trying to get a different angle of the players.
Changing the content of a photograph without labeling it as an illustration violates the ethics codes of most news organizations. Several photojournalists have lost their jobs in recent years over digitally manipulated photos.
PDN story....

Monday, April 9, 2007

"The newspaper lies, the radio lies, the TV lies, the streets, they howl with the truth."

A senior in college and a friend of mine who is the editor of Better Photography in India has this to say about the dying photojournalism in India in newspapers and magazines in particular. How true it is, go through the daily newspapers and magazines in India and they have nothing to offer to a photojournalist on assignment except for some semi nude pictures taken at a high soceity party for front page..read the stuff below...

'Where the Streets Have No Name',

"The newspaper lies, the radio lies, the TV lies, the streets, they howl with the truth."

Someone forwarded this to me a while ago and it has stayed with me since then. I have no clue who wrote it the first time around, but its truth is quite unnerving.

Where has street photography disappeared? The thirst for looking for images that sometimes stare at you and sometimes don’t, and all for their own sake, with no agenda, seems to be a dying art. It is definitely not 'fashionable' anymore —hunting without knowing where your next image is going to come from. The journey, without the destination. Fact is, a great deal of photojournalism found its roots here, on the streets. It is where most of the unedited truth of our society lies. If nothing else, a walk on the streets will sharpen reflexes and awareness to life around us, which can be highly engaging photographically.

But some of you who are possibly interested in a photography that is far from the streets — like glamour or advertising, must be wondering where does walking the streets leave you. Walk on, and you will be surprised to know that every once in a while even the hot shots of glamour or industrial photography take to the streets. It is like a touchstone for most.

So, where does photojournalism in India stand today?

What I see does not make for a pretty picture at all. A great deal of photojournalism one has been seeing in the recent past gives the impression that somewhere along the line, the sacred creed of photojournalists has disappeared. Every once in a while, one does see a spurt of good work and then it dies down (remember, I am referring to work that has appeared in India). If you were to ask me today, that when was the last time I saw a newspaper/magazine image (in India) that made me sit up — I will have to delve far back into my memory. But I do remember days not so long ago, when there would always be an image,that appeared in either a Telegraph or an Indian Express or wherever — a single image which made not just me, but a lot of others sit up. The image elicited discussions and comments. And photojournalism was alive.

But why, why only ‘was’ alive?

Photojournalists could not have suddenly forgotten the language of photography. In fact, there are more visuals being used in Indian publications today than ever before. Photo editors play an essential role in the planning of the magazine or newspaper, which a few years ago was the sole purview of the news editor. All of that has changed, thankfully.

Unfortunately, the price of progress seems too heavy today. One does see a good image every now and then. But it’s getting rare. A great deal of photojournalism that is happening in India is on assignments. Or incident based. It is like waiting for the good Lord to do something earth shattering, so that one can rush out with the camera and do the command performance. I remember when I was a rookie —a senior colleague of mine caught me sitting at my desk waiting for work to happen. He knew that the next planned assignment for me was a few hours away, and he had this to say, “What are you waiting for? A bomb blast in the city, so that you get a ‘page one’ tomorrow?”

I have still not forgotten that rap on my knuckles, though it has been more than 15 years. The words still sting as they did on that day. I try and shoot on the streets whenever possible, but more than that I look out for the work of people who do street photography. The names are few and far between. You see Manish Swarup’s images in the ‘http://www.manishswarup.com'. He has been one of the finest photojournalists in the country for close to two decades, but he still takes out time to shoot images, which are far removed from his daily work. And somewhere, those images, I feel, mend his soul.
-editor@betterphotography.in

Travel-Photo Essay


Kuntub beach, Muscat, Oman. April 6th, 2007

Travel-Photo Essay


Oman. April 6th, 2007

Travel-Photo Essay


Muthrah souq, Oman. April 6th, 2007

Travel-Photo Essay


Muthrah souq, Oman. April 6th, 2007

Thursday, April 5, 2007

A Chilling Photographers Hidden Story

A Chilling Photographers Hidden Story

A Chilling Photograph’s Hidden History Twenty-six years ago, a picture of an execution in Iran won the Pulitzer Prize. But the man who took it remained anonymous. Until now. The Ayatollah’s agents come calling By JOSHUA PRAGER December 2, 2006; Page A1

TEHRAN—On Aug. 27, 1979, two parallel lines of 11 men formed on a field of dry dirt in Sanandaj, Iran. One group wore blindfolds. The other held rifles. The command came in Farsi to fire: “Atesh!” Behind the soldier farthest to the right, a 12th man also shot, his Nikon camera and Kodak film preserving in black and white a mass execution.

Within hours, the photo ran across six columns in Ettela’at, the oldest newspaper in Iran. Within days, it appeared on front pages around the world. Within weeks, the new Iranian government annexed the offending paper. Within months, the photo won the Pulitzer Prize.
Jahangir Razmi The photograph that won the Pulitzer. Taken seven months after Islamic radicals overthrew the U.S.-backed Shah, the photo remains one of the most famous images of Iran. It is an icon of government terror, invoked in critiques of the regime from the 1979 poem “Screaming,” to the 1986 music video “Speak To Me From My Land, Iran” to the 1997 book “Kurdistan.” Davood and Davar Ghassemlouie, brothers who operate a photo shop in Los Angeles, say they have made tens of thousands of reprints for demonstrators, including 200 in late September when Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visited the U.S.

Says Shahrokh Hatami, a pioneer of Iranian photojournalism: “It is the most revealing photograph of the beginning of the Iranian revolution.”

Ettela’at, however, didn’t print the photographer’s name, fearing his safety. The Pulitzer was officially awarded to “an unnamed photographer of United Press International,” the news service that distributed the photo in the U.S. It remains the only time the award has ever been given to an anonymous recipient.

In the years since, several people have falsely claimed to be “Anonymous.” When Iran’s most famous photographer died in 2003, his obituaries were filled with mentions of a Pulitzer some say he had insinuated winning. Last September, another prominent Iranian photographer living in France was quoted in Paris Match magazine claiming credit for the work.

In fact, nearly three decades after the epochal photograph first appeared, almost no one knows who took it.

* * Jahangir Razmi grew up in the industrial city of Arak, in central Iran, the first child of a housewife and military clerk. Governed by the Shah, the nation was at peace. The boy was shy and happiest in a local photo shop helping a cousin develop film and shoot portraits of brides and soldiers. In 1960, at the age of 12, he bought a Russian Lubitel-2 camera.
THE PHOTOGRAPHS

The full set of 27 photographs Mr. Razmi preserved on a contact sheet and stowed away in his home, made public for the first time. DEVELOPMENT OF A PHOTO

Learn more about nine people who played roles either in an execution or in the publication and misattribution of Mr. Razmi’s photograph. WALL STREET JOURNAL VIDEO

Joshua Prager details his quest to track down the anonymous Pulitzer prize-winning photographer.He quickly put it to use. When one day a boy shot a girl dead outside his studio, a reporter urged Jahangir to photograph the scene. He did, the skirt and shirt of a bloodied school uniform preserved in the newsprint of Ettela’at.

When his father died, Mr. Razmi says he found work in a Tehran photo shop. When he served in the army, he found reprieve from military drills in a darkroom on base. When he photographed a 20th birthday party, he found a wife. And when Ettela’at—Farsi for “Information” —hired him in 1973 to shoot breaking news, he found a career.

“Although we were colleagues and there was a competition, his pictures were better,” says Jafar Danyeli, then one of seven staff photographers. Razmi, as everyone called him, paid attention to composition and chiaroscuro, the interplay of light and shadow. He sat at the desk closest to the stairwell. “I was always the volunteer to go,” says Mr. Razmi, then 25. “I was quick. I was young. I was braver than anyone else.”

On Jan. 16, 1979, the Shah fled Iran following mass demonstrations protesting his rule. Sixteen days later, Ayatollah Khomeini, a radical Islamic cleric, returned from France and seized control. Mr. Razmi photographed Mr. Khomeini in his Qom headquarters so regularly that he came to greet the imam with a handshake. Using his favorite Nikon lens, a 28mm wide-angle lens with automatic focus, Mr. Razmi chronicled the conversion of Iran to theocracy from autocracy.

By August, about 500 alleged counter-revolutionaries and officials of the former regime had been executed. The judiciary decreed it illegal to criticize Islam and Iran’s spiritual leaders. A holding company formed by the regime appropriated Kayhan, the only newspaper in Iran larger than Ettela’at. Journalists who pushed back at censorship under the Shah were petrified.

“Under Khomeini they would kill you,” says Amir Taheri, then editor of Kayhan and now a political analyst living in England. “It was a different ballgame.”

On Aug. 16, Mr. Khomeini called on Iranian troops to suppress restive Kurds hoping for autonomy. Thousands of soldiers headed 300 miles northwest to the Iranian province of Kurdistan. Mr. Razmi and Khalil Bahrami, an Ettela’at reporter, followed.

Jahangir Razmi with the Nikon camera he used to photograph an execution on Aug. 27, 1979. Ten days later, Mr. Bahrami received a tip that a judge he had befriended was set to try Kurds in an antechamber of the municipal airport at Sanandaj, the capital of Kurdistan. The reporter, then 37, had worked at Ettela’at for 22 years and was thankful he was paired with the young Mr. Razmi, whose father had lived in Sanandaj and had raised his son to admire the Kurds and their traditions. “He knew his responsibility,” says Mr. Bahrami, who lives in Iran and is retired. “And he was quicker than the others.”

At the airport, Mr. Razmi stood ready outside the makeshift courtroom as 10 handcuffed men filled a wooden bench before the judge, a black-bearded Shiite cleric named Sadegh Khalkhali. An injured 11th prisoner lay on a stretcher beside the door.

The judge removed his turban, Mr. Bahrami recalls. He removed his shoes. He put his feet on a chair. Scanning the prisoners through thick eyeglasses, he asked their names. Officers of the court told of the defendants’ alleged crimes—of trafficking arms, inciting riots and murder. The prisoners, some with leftward or nationalist leanings, denied the accusations.

No evidence was presented, Mr. Bahrami says. “It was pure speculation.” After roughly 30 minutes, Mr. Khalkhali declared the 11 men “corrupt on earth” - mofsedin fel arz - the Koranic phrase he cited before issuing a sentence of death. A few of the men cried.

Mr. Bahrami summoned his colleague Mr. Razmi. “It was Razmi’s luck that day that he was with me,” the reporter says.

Mr. Razmi withdrew from his green canvas shoulder bag a 35-80mm lens and attached the zoom to his Nikon FE. The handcuffed men were blindfolded. Each put his hand on the shoulder of the man before him and together they walked single-file through the airport’s concrete lobby, through a metal doorframe and toward an open airfield. Mr. Razmi darted ahead and shot, untroubled by security forces: “I was totally free,” he says. Unbeknownst to Mr. Razmi, a soldier present also was taking pictures, which were never published.

The caravan passed roughly 30 airport workers, both men say. Up front walked Mr. Razmi. In the rear, both men say, was Ali Karimi, one of the judge’s bodyguards, wearing white shoes, white pants, white shirt, sunglasses and twin hip holsters. After about 100 yards, an officer halted the condemned on a plain of dry dirt. All but one of the executioners tied about their own heads Iranian shawls called chafiyehs. Both the faces of the Shiites and the eyes of the Kurds were now concealed.

Mr. Karimi asked the prisoners if they had last words, the two journalists recall. The men didn’t, all silent save a man Mr. Bahrami later reported to be Essa Pirvali, who wept aloud. A sandwich maker, he belonged to no political party but possessed a handgun and had been accused of murder. “He was scared,” Mr. Razmi says. “He wouldn’t stand.” The soldiers instructed a fellow prisoner to hold him.

An afternoon sun shone behind the prisoners and Mr. Razmi reached for his 28mm lens. He sidled in behind members of the firing squad, who stood in brown leather boots laced to the calf. He thought, he says, only about “speed and angle.” The prisoners stood in plainclothes. The firing squad crouched in camouflage.

“Afrad mosallah!,” yelled the commanding officer, calling his troops to attention. His charges aimed their G3 rifles at the midsections of the men standing little more than a body’s length away.

Standing farthest to the right, Naser Salimi, an employee of the Sanandaj health department, raised his right hand to his chest. It was bandaged, injured in a street fight that had led to his sentencing, according to contemporary newspaper reports. Opposite him, the only soldier who wore no chafiyeh raised his rifle.

Mr. Razmi stood a few feet behind this unmasked gunman. He raised his camera. At 4:30 p.m., the command came to fire: “Atesh!” Eleven guns discharged. Eleven bodies dropped. “When they fell, it was dusty,” Mr. Razmi says. The photographer lowered his camera.

The soldiers eyed Mr. Karimi, the judge’s bodyguard, lifting a pistol off his right hip. Not all of the men were dead, the photographer recalls. The bodyguard leaned over Ahsan Nahid, the injured prisoner on the stretcher, and fired one bullet into his head. Mr. Razmi snapped his Nikon. Mr. Karimi stepped to the next man and shot him, too. He proceeded along—one bullet per body, both journalists say. (Recent efforts to locate Mr. Karimi were unsuccessful.)

WITHIN MINUTES, ambulances ferried away the 11 bodies, airport workers returned to work, the huddle of soldiers thinned and Mr. Razmi stowed his two rolls of Kodak 400 film in a pocket of his canvas bag. After a helicopter flight landed the pair too late to cover a second execution, Mr. Razmi left his colleague, flagged a passing minibus and returned to the airport in Sanandaj, where at 8 a.m. the only daily flight to Tehran departed.

The photographer fell asleep. He was awakened at a checkpoint by shouts from airport officers, the same men who had shared their lunch with him the previous afternoon as they awaited the Kurdish prisoners. “It’s me!” yelled Mr. Razmi. “Jahangir!” The men held their fire. Mr. Razmi told them he had film and an article that had to get back to Tehran. “I put it in an envelope and gave it to the flight attendant,” he says, needing to continue his work in the region.

Mr. Razmi called Ettela’at, which dispatched a courier to the airport. The man picked up the white envelope from Tehran airport and delivered it to the newspaper. Ali Akbar Moradi, head of the paper’s darkroom, says he knew the 70 exposures were taken by Mr. Razmi and that he turned them into two contact sheets with the help of a technician. An office runner gave them to the photo editor, the late Fereydoun Ebrahimzadeh, who marked the frames he wished turned into prints and delivered them to Mohammed Heydari, the chief Ettela’at editor, Mr. Heydari says.

Mr. Heydari was examining the layout of that day’s front page and flipped through the stills. At about noon, he says, he stopped, overwhelmed by a single image of the moment when some of the squadron had fired and some hadn’t. Bodies fell. Dust rose.

Mr. Heydari, then 35, had little time to think—the afternoon paper was about to go to print. He says he told himself that the country was conflicted over the killing of the Kurds and angry over censorship. He decided to publish the photograph, although not in the edition distributed in the Kurdistan province, where it would be tantamount to a call to arms. “Considering the political climate, I knew I could get away with it,” Mr. Heydari says.

The Ettela’at editor made another snap decision. The photograph would run with no credit. “I was aware that if I published his name, he would be in danger,” Mr. Heydari says. “I wanted to protect Razmi.”

By 2 p.m., newsstands across Tehran trumpeted word of the Kurdish executions. The banner headline read: “Forty People Executed in Sanandaj, Marivan and Saqqez.” The accompanying photograph was a sensation, the seven months of Iranian firing squads distilled to one image.

Copies of Ettela’at sold out and representatives of international news agencies hustled to Khayam Street to buy prints. The photo editor, Mr. Ebrahimzadeh, “sold it to everyone like he was selling French fries,” says Alfred Yaghobzadeh, 47, then a photographer for the Associated Press, now a photojournalist based in France.

The first to arrive at Ettela’at was Sajid Rizvi of United Press International. Mr. Rizvi, then 30, had seen the newspaper at his home, ordered a copy by phone and sped off in the company’s pistachio-colored sedan. He picked up the photo roughly 15 minutes later inside the Ettela’at newsroom.

“It was almost wet when I took it,” says Mr. Rizvi, now editor of an arts publishing house in London. “I don’t think I have ever seen a picture as moving as that,” he says. “It is a picture between life and death.”

Mr. Rizvi asked who had snapped it. “They said, ‘better not to give out the name of the photographer.’ ” Once home, he walked into the bathroom he had converted into a darkroom, dried the photo with a hairdryer, composed a caption on his yellow Olympus typewriter, phoned the UPI desk in Brussels and transmitted the print.

Genghis Seren, a photo editor in Brussels, sat transfixed beside the company UniFax. “The drama of that machine was that the picture took 15 minutes to complete,” recalls Mr. Seren, then 25 years old and in his first year at UPI. “It came a 10th of an inch after a 10th of an inch…. It was something!” Mr. Seren forwarded the photo to UPI bureaus in Africa, Europe and the Middle East, and to company headquarters in Manhattan.

“It was transmitted to us with no name,” says Larry DeSantis, the UPI managing editor who received the photo 11 stories above 42nd Street. “Not knowing who made it interested me.”

At about 3 p.m., several armed agents from the Islamic Revolutionary Council arrived at Ettela’at, ascended four flights and entered the office of the editor, Mr. Heydari. They asked for the negative of the photo and asked to speak with the photo editor, Mr. Heydari recalls.

Mr. Heydari refused. “I said, ‘No. I am the editor. I take full responsibility.’ ” Mr. Heydari says he told the men: “If I am arrested, the negative consequences will outweigh the effect of this photo.”

The chief agent backed off. Both men telephoned government and religious officials, and the judge who ordered the executions radioed the agent seated beside Mr. Heydari, the editor says.

Mr. Khalkhali, the judge, declared the photo a fabrication and told the agent to arrest the editor, Mr. Heydari says. He says he responded by offering to show the negatives to the agent “as long as you agree not to use force to confiscate them.”

The agent agreed and viewed the negatives with two fellow officials. “They were astonished,” recalls Mr. Heydari. The agent made another call and told Iran’s attorney general that “the newspaper has been considerate to only publish this one,” Mr. Heydari remembers. The agents left with one proviso: Upon their return from Kurdistan, Messrs. Bahrami and Razmi should come in for questioning.

THAT SAME DAY, Mr. DeSantis, the UPI editor, had prints of the photo distributed by motorcycle to the New York papers and by telephoto machine to thousands of papers across the country. On Aug. 29, the New York Times, Washington Post, Der Tagesspiegel in Berlin and the Daily Telegraph in London were among the many newspapers to run it. Nearly all credited UPI.

“Our play was fabulous,” exults Mr. DeSantis, now retired. “It was a once in a lifetime…. Like it was a movie set. One guy kneeling, aiming. One guy falling. A mass execution.”

Mr. Razmi remained in Kurdistan, where at a Sanandaj newsstand he came across a copy of Ettela’at featuring one of his other photos showing the blindfolded men standing in wait. He understood why his more incendiary photographs were unprinted but nonetheless was disappointed. “I expected my name to be published,” he says.

Two days later, reporter and photographer returned to the Ettela’at office in Sanandaj. The office manager lifted from his desk the Tehran edition of the paper that had reported the execution, they recall. He said copies brought to Kurdistan were selling for more than double the cover price. The manager was a Kurd and Mr. Razmi recalls him saying: ” ‘We have to build a statue of gold of you.’ And because of what he told me, I understood that this photo was dangerous.”

Close readers of Ettela’at could have surmised Mr. Razmi was the photographer. On Aug. 26, the day before the execution, the newspaper named him as one of three employees it had sent “to the Western portion of the country.” An Aug. 29, the day after the photo ran, the paper reported on its front page that he and Mr. Bahrami had been “sent to Kurdistan.”

Home in Tehran, after a long shower, Mr. Razmi spoke about the execution to his wife and again the next morning to curious colleagues in the newsroom. He says he asked Mr. Heydari why his photo had carried no credit and didn’t object when the editor explained his worry. “I told him jokingly that you would have also been executed in Kurdistan on the spot,” Mr. Heydari says.

Mr. Razmi walked to the newspaper darkroom and saw for the first time what had been the 18th exposure of his first roll of film. “There I realized what I had taken,” he says. Turning on the red safelights in the studio, the photographer made prints of eight stills and preserved on a contact sheet 27 of his 70 photographs.

Mr. Razmi asked the darkroom supervisor for his negatives and locked them in the middle of his three metal drawers together with his other prints. A few days later, he slipped the contact sheet and stills into the fold of a newspaper and hid them in his home, “somewhere no one would have noticed,” he says. The next morning, he returned to Kurdistan.

On Sept. 9, the Islamic Revolutionary Council published a notice in the Islamic Revolution newspaper: “we hereby draw your attention to the picture which was published on the front page of [Ettela’at] on 6/6/1358 and was objected to harshly by the public.” It continued: “If this occurs again, serious decisions will be made.”

A serious decision already had been made. The day before, the Foundation for the Disinherited—the holding company that in August had swallowed Kayhan, Iran’s largest paper—also seized Ettela’at. Overnight, the paper, privately held since 1920, became state-owned.

The image continued to spread. Reza Deghati, then 27, a free-lance Iranian photographer, had seen the photo. It is “the most stirring execution picture in the history of photojournalism, of the human being,” he says. Mr. Deghati says he procured five additional photos of the execution from an Ettela’at employee and mailed them to SIPA, the Paris agency that had been publishing his own photos since the revolution.

Goksin Sipahioglu says he received the prints from Mr. Deghati at his agency on Paris’s Rue Roquepine. Even though UPI had already published one, Michele Sola, photo editor of Paris Match magazine, paid 14,000 French francs (about $10,000 today) for the additional prints. Mr. Sipahioglu forwarded half that sum to Mr. Deghati in Tehran.

The magazine went on sale in Paris days before its Sept. 21, 1979, cover date. About 2,600 miles east, readers in Iran turned to page 66. Titled “Les Kurdes, sous les balles d’Allah” (“The Kurds, under Allah’s bullets”), the photos spread rapidly. People paid 20 times the cover price for the magazine, and dozens of Iranians tacked the photos about town.

No one, however, neither Mr. Razmi nor the Iranian brain trust, seemed to notice the magazine’s erroneous credit - “Reza (Sipa)” - printed in the lower left corner of the index page. “When someone sends a picture to us,” explains Mr. Sipahioglu, “we always credit him.”

Mr. Deghati says he sent SIPA a letter saying he didn’t take the photos and that SIPA sent out a news release via the AP retracting his name. Representatives at SIPA, Paris Match and the AP don’t recall Mr. Deghati clarifying the matter and didn’t find such a release in their archives.

Mr. Razmi returned from Kurdistan in late September and Mr. Ebrahimzadeh approached him at his desk. The photo editor asked for the negatives of the 70 photos and extended his hand. “I couldn’t protest,” Mr. Razmi says. “It belonged to him.” He unlocked his metal drawer. Mr. Ebrahimzadeh told the photographer the police wished to speak to him in Tehran’s Evin prison, Mr. Razmi recalls.

Mr. Razmi says he arrived at the prison with Mr. Bahrami and two Ettela’at editors, and quickly found himself alone with the late Asadollah Lajevardi, a future warden of the prison already notorious for torturing inmates. As part of his newspaper duties, Mr. Razmi had often photographed men housed in Evin whom the state would soon execute. “I had a right to be nervous,” he says.

Mr. Lajevardi asked him who had photographed the Sanandaj execution, Mr. Razmi says. When Mr. Razmi said he had, the guard asked why he had hidden his negatives in the drawer. “So that no one would take them,” Mr. Razmi recalls answering.

He told Mr. Lajevardi that he had permission from the judge to shoot the scene and that he hadn’t sent the pictures overseas. The interrogation was soft, and it became apparent to Mr. Razmi that he wouldn’t be harmed. Mr. Razmi returned to the paper, and a few weeks later was consumed with work when, on Nov. 4, Iranian students took hostages inside the U.S. Embassy.

The next month, UPI managing editor Mr. DeSantis sat down to submit his newswire’s best work of the year for awards. At the top of his list was the execution photo. “I was a very good picture editor,” Mr. DeSantis says, “but on this one you could be a dumb dog and pick this out.”

That neither he nor anyone at UPI knew who took the photo was of little concern. The agency had been the first to provide it to the press and presented it as the work of an unnamed UPI photographer, which, says Mr. DeSantis, he assumed it was. “It came on the UPI wire,” he explains.

“Because of the present unrest in Iran,” wrote the editor to the Pulitzer committee, “the name of the photographer cannot be revealed at this time.”

Mr. Razmi didn’t know his photograph had been nominated for the Pulitzer. He didn’t know the jury nominating finalists for Spot News Photography was overwhelmed by the entry UPI titled, “Firing Squad in Iran.” Robert Duffy, then an editor at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and chairman of the jury, says he informally lobbied a member of the Pulitzer Board that spring to pick the photo. “We were hell-bent on giving the prize to ‘Anonymous,’ ” he says.

On April 14, 1980, seven days after the U.S. severed diplomatic relations with Iran, ‘Anonymous’ won the Pulitzer Prize. Mr. Heydari told Mr. Razmi the news. But the same people who, in effect, had ordered the execution now owned his employer. Mr. Heydari says he was fired two months later. Representatives of the paper cancelled an August 2005 appointment at their Tehran head office and declined to be interviewed for this article.

Ettela’at didn’t report news of its prize-winning employee. Mr. Razmi says he “didn’t have the guts to celebrate.”

UPI did. The newswire flew its Tehran bureau chief Mr. Rizvi to the U.S. and had him speak to subscribers. “They were trying to show me off,” he says. Asked about the anonymous photographer, Mr. Rizvi recalls answering: “Eventually it will be revealed.”

IN THE SPRING, Ettela’at promoted Mr. Razmi, then 32, to photo editor. Iraq attacked Iran in September and Mr. Razmi covered the war. A mortar deafened his right ear in 1987. When months later Ettela’at asked him to work in Iraq, he decided he was tired of war. He quit his employer of 15 years, sold the home he had built by himself in a leafy neighborhood of northern Tehran, bought an apartment and opened a photography studio.

Forty years old, the photographer had come full circle, developing film and shooting portraits as he had as a boy. Says Mr. Razmi: “I was looking for a peaceful life.”

Mr. Razmi called the studio “Abgineh,” the Farsi word for glassware, which he says connoted for him the clarity of water. He didn’t advertise the studio. Still, six days a week, brides in gowns flocked to the shop, looked at Mr. Razmi and smiled.

Mr. Razmi thought often of Sanandaj. In his shop, he hung a large portrait of a boy wearing a Kurdish shawl and sash. Every summer, during the month of Shahrivar, he locked himself in his bedroom and looked at the execution photographs he had hidden.

On Aug. 3, 1997, three weeks before Shahrivar, Mohammad Khatami took office as president of Iran and hired Hashem Taleb to head his public relations. Mr. Razmi had met Mr. Taleb years before and saw a business opportunity. He drove to the office of the president, pronounced the headshots of Iranian officials unbefitting their rank and “suggested I take photographs of the president and the cabinet,” he recalls. Mr. Taleb hired him.

Days later, Mr. Razmi, the first “Official Photographer of the President and his Cabinet,” set up his flash umbrellas inside the Iranian presidential residence at the intersection of Palestine and Pastor streets. He shot pictures of the new government. He developed the color portraits. Before mailing the prints to the president’s office, he stamped his name on the back of each.

The name Jahangir Razmi, however, remained unconnected to his most famous photograph. Monir Nahid, mother of two of the executed men, who has since settled in Los Angeles, says over time, “10, 20 people came to me and said, ‘I took the picture.’ “

Among them, say Mrs. Nahid and her daughter, was Mr. Deghati, the stringer who in 1979 sent the photo to Paris Match. Mr. Deghati, who left Iran in 1981 and today lives in France working for Magnum Photos, says he has never met the Nahids. Last September, Paris Match magazine quoted him saying he took the photo, adding in French that Mr. Khomeini “was furious.” Mr. Deghati says he knows Mr. Razmi took the photo, and that the magazine misquoted him.

Mr. Razmi says he first learned about a decade ago that others were claiming his work. Kaveh Golestan, Iran’s best-known photographer, reported to him that Mr. Deghati had said as much at a European photo exhibit. Mr. Razmi didn’t know that Mr. Golestan also had taken credit for the photo in classes he taught, according to several of his photojournalism students at Tehran University.

When Mr. Golestan died in 2003, after stepping on a landmine in Iraq, newspapers around the world reported that he had won a Pulitzer Prize. His widow, Hengameh Golestan, says her late husband never took credit for the photo and that the obituaries were mistaken. Mrs. Golestan says she knows Mr. Razmi took the photo.

On the fourth floor of a cement apartment building in northern Tehran, Mr. Razmi sat on a dimpled leather couch. His living room walls were barren of his work. Beside him on his couch, his son Ali sat rapt, tamping down a pinch of Cavendish tobacco in his father’s pipe. Mr. Razmi struck a match and puffed.

“My sons have told me a lot of times that I should go and prove that I am the photographer,” Mr. Razmi said, his voice soft and his eyes cast down. “I said, ‘No. Better not.’ “

It is understandable why he feared claiming credit for such a public indictment of the Islamic Revolution. The hardline Mr. Ahmadinejad, elected in June 2005, shuttered Shargh, the country’s last large reformist newspaper, three months ago. Mr. Razmi also was still the official government photographer and returned the next morning to the presidential residence to shoot Mr. Ahmadinejad’s cabinet, including the defense minister who in 1979 helped quell the Kurds.

But Mr. Razmi, who is now 58, said part of him always wanted to step forward. He was disappointed when he first saw that his photo didn’t carry his name. He was irked when others took credit, people who “never feel the danger,” he said. And all the time, he was weighted by his secret, that of an ordinary man witness to extraordinary events. “Without this picture,” he said, “I wouldn’t be anything.”

Emboldened by time and dismayed by the opportunism of his fellow photographers, Mr. Razmi decided the moment was right to tell his tale after this newspaper approached him. “My name should be there,” he said.

Minced lamb and baghali polo - a dish of green rice and beans - awaited Mr. Razmi at home, and he sat down to eat with his wife and sons, his sister, two nephews and his father-in-law. They talked about Mr. Razmi identifying himself, for the first time, as the anonymous photographer.

Mr. Razmi had done nothing wrong, they reasoned. He photographed the execution with the permission of the judge. He turned over his negatives to the photo editor. He described his work to the prison guard. He wasn’t the one who sent the six images abroad. He didn’t earn a single rial or credit from his photo, the rights to which had passed from UPI to the Bettmann Archive to Corbis Corp.

The family approved of his decision to come forward. Voicing hope that it wouldn’t harm Mr. Razmi, eight people around the table spoke as one: “Inshallah,” if Allah wills it.

Past midnight, Mr. Razmi retreated to a bedroom closet and lifted his canvas camera bag by the faded strap that had hung over his shoulder during the 1979 revolution. Here in pale black ink on the inside flap of a pocket was written in Farsi, “Jahangir Razmi, Ettela’at, 328 331” —the newsroom number to phone in the event of his death.

Mr. Razmi returned to his living room. He had unearthed his contact sheet and stills for his annual look back at the execution. “I have pictures that have never been published,” he said.

The photographer held in his right hand a sheaf of black-and-white photographs, 27 images that were 26 years, five days old. He withdrew from a plastic sleeve a furling photo of the sandwich maker who cried as he waited to be shot.

Mr. Razmi thrust it forward. “Who has this picture?” he asked, his voice rising. “Nobody.” He thrust forward a photo of the dust that rose over 11 fallen men. “Who has this picture?” he asked. “Nobody.” He thrust forward a photo of the bodyguard surveying the men he had shot. “Who has this picture?” he asked. “Nobody.”

Mr. Razmi returned the photos to the sleeve that had held them since 1979. And for the first time since he had secreted them home in a folded newspaper, he put them in a Samsonite briefcase he had long used to store chosen photos from his career.

Says Mr. Razmi: “There’s no more reason to hide.”

Write to Joshua Prager at joshua.prager@wsj.com
by Newsha Tavakolian at Tue Dec 05 17:09:30 UTC 2006 (ed. Mar 14 2007)